Comparison of failure modes and effects analyses and time for brachytherapy ring and tandem applicator digitization between manual and solid applicator source placement methods.

PURPOSE: Ring and tandem (R&T) applicator digitization is currently performed at our institution by manually defining the extent of the applicators. Digitization can also be achieved using solid applicators: predefined, 3D models with geometric constraints. This study compares R&T digitization using manual and solid applicator methods through Failure Modes and Effects Analyses (FMEAs) and comparative time studies. We aim to assess the suitability of solid applicator method implementation for R&T cases METHODS: Six qualified medical physicists (QMPs) and two medical physics residents scored potential modes of failure of manual digitization in an FMEA as recommended by TG-100. Occurrence, severity, and detectability (OSD) values were averaged across respondents and then multiplied to form combined Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) for analysis. Participants were trained to perform treatment planning using a developed solid applicator protocol and asked to score a second FMEA on the distinct process steps from the manual method. For both methods, participant digitization was timed. FMEA and time data were analyzed across methods and participant samples RESULTS: QMPs rated the RPNs of the current, manual method of digitization statistically lower than residents did. When comparing the unique FMEA steps between the two digitization methods, QMP respondents found no significant difference in RPN means. Residents, however, rated the solid applicator method as higher risk. Further, after the solid applicator method was performed twice by participants, the time to digitize plans was not significantly different from manual digitization CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates the non-inferiority of the solid applicator method to manual digitization in terms of risk, according to QMPs, and time, across all participants. Differences were found in FMEA evaluation and solid applicator technique adoption based on years of brachytherapy experience. Further practice with the solid applicator protocol is recommended because familiarity is expected to lower FMEA occurrence ratings and further reduce digitization times.

Comparison of Gonadal Toxicity of Single-Fraction Ultra-High Dose Rate and Conventional Radiation in Mice.

Purpose: Increasing evidence suggests that ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) radiation could result in similar tumor control as conventional (CONV) radiation therapy (RT) while reducing toxicity to surrounding healthy tissues. Considering that radiation toxicity to gonadal tissues can cause hormone disturbances and infertility in young patients with cancer, the purpose of this study was to assess the possible role of UHDR-RT in reducing toxicity to healthy gonads in mice compared with CONV-RT. Methods and Materials: Radiation was delivered to the abdomen or pelvis of female (8 or 16 Gy) and male (5 Gy) C57BL/6J mice, respectively, at conventional (∼0.4 Gy/s) or ultrahigh (>100 Gy/s) dose rates using an IntraOp Mobetron linear accelerator. Organ weights along with histopathology and immunostaining of irradiated gonads were used to compare toxicity between radiation modalities. Results: CONV-RT and UHDR-RT induced a similar decrease in uterine weights at both studied doses (∼50% of controls), which indicated similarly reduced ovarian follicular activity. Histologically, ovaries of CONV- and UHDR-irradiated mice exhibited a comparable lack of follicles. Weights of CONV- and UHDR-irradiated testes were reduced to ∼30% of controls, and the percentage of degenerate seminiferous tubules was also similar between radiation modalities (∼80% above controls). Pairwise comparisons of all quantitative data indicated statistical significance between irradiated (CONV or UHDR) and control groups (from P ≤ .01 to P ≤ .0001) but not between radiation modalities. Conclusions: The data presented here suggest that the short-term effects of UHDR-RT on the mouse gonads are comparable to those of CONV-RT.

A framework for automated and streamlined kV cone beam computed tomography image quality assurance: a multi-institutional study.

The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a framework to support automated standardized testing and analysis of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) image quality QA across multiple institutions. A survey was conducted among the participating institutions to understand the variability of the CBCT QA practices. A commercial, automated software platform was validated by seven institutions participating in a consortium dedicated to automated quality assurance. The CBCT image analysis framework was used to compare periodic QA results among 23 linear accelerators (linacs) from seven institutions. The CBCT image quality metrics (geometric distortion, spatial resolution, contrast, HU constancy, uniformity and noise) data are plotted as a function of means with the upper and lower control limits compared to the linac acceptance criteria and AAPM recommendations. For example, mean geometric distortion and HU constancy metrics were found to be 0.13 mm (TG142 recommendation: ≤2 mm) and 13.4 respectively (manufacturer acceptance specification: ≤±50).Image upload and analysis process was fully automated using a MATLAB-based platform. This analysis enabled a quantitative, longitudinal assessment of the performance of quality metrics which were also compared across 23 linacs. For key CBCT parameters such as uniformity, contrast, and HU constancy, all seven institutions used stricter goals than what would be recommended based on the analysis of the upper and lower control limits. These institutional goals were also found to be stricter than that found in AAPM published guidance. This work provides a reference that could be used to machine-specific optimized tolerance of CBCT image maintenance via control charts to monitor performance we well as the sensitivity of different tests in support of a broader quality assurance program. To ensure the daily image quality needed for patient care, the optimized statistical QA metrics recommended to using along with risk-based QA.

Validating kQ =1.0 assumption in TG51 with PTW 30013 farmer chamber for Varian TrueBeam's 2.5 MV imaging beam.

AAPM Report 142 recommends and the State of Ohio requires that the imaging dose be quantified in radiotherapy applications. Using the TG51 dose calibration protocol for MV Imaging dose measurement requires knowledge of the kQ parameter for the beam quality and the ionization chamber type under investigation. The %dd(10)x of the Varian TrueBeam 2.5 MV imaging beam falls outside the range of the available data for the calculation of the kQ value. Due to the similarities of the 2.5 MV imaging beam and the 60 Co beam, we and others made the assumption that kQ = 1.0 in TG51 calculations. In this study, we used the TG21 and TG51 calibration protocols in conjunction to validate that kQ = 1.0 for the 2.5 MV imaging beam using a PTW 30013 farmer chamber. Standard measurements for TG51 absolute dosimetry QA were performed at 100 cm SSD, 10 cm depth, 10 × 10 field size, delivering 100 Monitor Units to a waterproof Farmer Chamber (PTW TN30013) for both 2.5 and 6 MV. Both the TG21 and TG51 formalisms were used to calculate the dose to water per MU at dmax (Dw /MU) for the 6 MV beam. The calculated outputs were 1.0005 and 1.0004 cGy/MU respectively. The TG21 formalism was then used to calculate (Dw /MU) for the 2.5 MV imaging beam. This value was then used in the TG51 formalism to find kQ for the 2.5 MV imaging beam. A kQ value of 1.00 ± 0.01 was calculated for 2.5 MV using this method.

Quality assurance for a six degrees-of-freedom table using a 3D printed phantom.

PURPOSE: To establish a streamlined end-to-end test of a 6 degrees-of-freedom (6DoF) robotic table using a 3D printed phantom for periodic quality assurance. METHODS: A 3D printed phantom was fabricated with translational and rotational offsets and an imbedded central ball-bearing (BB). The phantom underwent each step of the radiation therapy process: CT simulation in a straight orientation, plan generation using the treatment planning software, setup to offset marks at the linac, registration and corrected 6DoF table adjustments via hidden target test, delivery of a Winston-Lutz test to the BB, and verification of table positioning via field and laser lights. The registration values, maximum total displacement of the combined Winston-Lutz fields, and a pass or fail criterion of the laser and field lights were recorded. The quality assurance process for each of the three linacs were performed for the first 30 days. RESULTS: Within a 95% confidence interval, the overall uncertainty values for both translation and rotation were below 1.0 mm and 0.5° for each linac respectively. When combining the registration values and other uncertainties for all three linacs, the average deviations were within 2.0 mm and 1.0° of the designed translation and rotation offsets of the 3D print respectively. For all three linacs, the maximum total deviation for the Winston-Lutz test did not exceed 1.0 mm. Laser and light field verification was within tolerance every day for all three linacs given the latest guidance documentation for table repositioning. CONCLUSION: The 3D printer is capable of accurately fabricating a quality assurance phantom for 6DoF positioning verification. The end-to-end workflow allows for a more efficient test of the 6DoF mechanics while including other important tests needed for routine quality assurance.

Synthesis of a small library of 3-(carboranylalkyl)thymidines and their biological evaluation as substrates for human thymidine kinases 1 and 2.

A small library consisting of two series of thymidine derivatives containing o-carboranylalkyl groups at the N-3 position was prepared. In both series, alkyl spacers of 2-7 methylene units were placed between the o-carborane cage and the thymidine scaffold. In one series, an additional dihydroxypropyl substituent was introduced at the second carbon atom of the carborane cage. In the series of N-3-substituted carboranyl thymidines without additional dihydroxypropyl substituent, three steps were required to obtain the target compounds in overall yields as high as 75%, while in the series of N-3-substituted carboranyl thymidines with additional dihydroxypropyl substituent, 9-10 steps were necessary with significantly lower overall yield. All target compounds were good substrates of human cytosolic thymidine kinase 1 while they were, if at all, poor substrates of the mitochondrial thymidine kinase 2. There was only a minor difference in phosphorylation rates between N-3-substituted carboranyl thymidines with additional dihydroxypropyl substituents with thymidine kinase 1 (range: 13-49% relative to thymidine) and their counterparts lacking this group (range: 11-57% relative to thymidine). Tether lengths of two and five methylene groups in both series gave the highest enzyme activities in the present study. A hypothesis for this result is presented.